Flashback: a glance again at Intel-powered smartphones and tablets

Whereas ARM and Qualcomm have launched some superior cellular GPUs, we form of want that…

Flashback: a glance again at Intel-powered smartphones and tablets

Whereas ARM and Qualcomm have launched some superior cellular GPUs, we form of want that Nvidia would begin making smartphone chipsets once more or not less than license GPU designs. AMD dipped its toes again in once more, why should not Nvidia? For now we are able to solely reminisce about Nvidia-powered telephones. The GPU maker is not the one one to drop out of the race both, Texas Devices was farily standard at one level too.

After which there’s Intel. Nonetheless the dominant provider of laptop computer, desktop and server CPUs, Intel’s time as a chipset maker for cellular gadgets did not depart such a legacy. It did begin okay, although, and unusually sufficient it began with ARM.

Flashback: a glance again at Intel-powered smartphones and tablets

Intel licensed the ARMv5 instruction set and constructed on it to create Xscale. The primary chips had been the PXA210 and PXA250, operating at 200MHz and 400MHz, respectively, they usually had been aimed toward PDAs, Private Digital Assistants (from a contemporary perspective we would name them “smartphones with out the cellphone half”).

Intel was focusing on high-end PDAs and in 2002 that meant pocketable gadgets that would decode video and MP3s and had options like wi-fi connectivity. Listed below are some attention-grabbing numbers about these chips:

  • the PXA210 value $17, the PXA250 was $39.20 (in 2002 {dollars})
  • the PXA250 consumed 256mW at 200MHz and 411mW at 300Mhz
  • the PXA250 measured 17x17mm and got here in a 256-pin ball grid array, the PXA210 was lower right down to 225 pins (through the use of a 16-bit knowledge bus as a substitute of 32-bit)

The PXA250 powered the likes of the Samsung i700. This one did have cell connectivity (2G with GPRS knowledge), a 240 x 320px resistive contact show, a single VGA digital camera and an MMC card slot. It ran Home windows PocketPC 2003 Telephone version (which has little or no to do with the Home windows Telephone that got here later).

The Samsung i300 is an attention-grabbing one. Not a PDA clearly, this ran Home windows Cellular 2003 SE Smartphone. It was a chunky factor, measuring 20mm thick, and it had a big (for the time) quantity of storage – a 3GB microdrive.

The Samsung i750 was additionally phone-like, nonetheless, in contrast to the i300 it had a touchscreen. A tiny 2.6″ resistive touchscreen, however nonetheless. Whereas the slider design allow you to disguise the keypad, the entrance was adorned with a stunning variety of {hardware} buttons. The i750 was even thicker at 22mm, but it surely did not have a microdrive. As a substitute it used a type of newfangled microSD playing cards for further storage.


Samsung i700
Samsung i300
Samsung i750

Samsung i700 • Samsung i300 • Samsung i750

Motorola had some curious designs from that period. The Motorola A1200 was pretty typical with a clear flip cowl that protected the resistive contact show (and prevented unintentional touches). This show was someway tinier than the i750 one at 2.4″.

The Motorola Q8 went after the BlackBerry demographic with a {hardware} QWERTY under the show (2.4″ panorama). There have been additionally flip telephones just like the A910 – not as sharp as a Razr, this one is attention-grabbing is that it prevented the Microsoft hegemony and ran a Linux-based OS as a substitute. The E680 was one other instance of a Linux cellphone.


Motorola A1200
Motorola Q8
Motorola A910
Motorola E680

Motorola A1200 • Motorola Q8 • Motorola A910 • Motorola E680

O2 XDA gadgets belong on this checklist as nicely. The O2 XDA II, for instance, had a “enormous” 3.5″ show (nonetheless 240 x 320px, although). There was additionally the i-mate PDA2, a reasonably normal machine. For an oddball design, try the tiny laptop computer that was the Qtek 9000.

By the way in which, do these really feel like they’ve one thing in frequent? Moreover the XScale chipsets we imply. That is proper, they had been all made by HTC again in its ODM days.


O2 XDA II
i-mate PDA2
Qtek 9000

O2 XDA II • i-mate PDA2 • Qtek 9000

BlackBerry used XScale chips too – they had been featured on a number of the hottest fashions just like the BB Pearl 8100, Pearl Flip 8220, the Curve 8300 and extra.


BlackBerry Pearl 8100
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220
BlackBerry Curve 8300

BlackBerry Pearl 8100 • BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 • BlackBerry Curve 8300

Palm used XScale chips as nicely, operating largely the corporate’s PalmOS, although there have been Home windows Cellular gadgets just like the Treo 500v.


Palm Centro
Palm Treo 500v
Palm Treo 650
Palm Treo 680

Palm Centro • Palm Treo 500v • Palm Treo 650 • Palm Treo 680

In 2006, simply 4 years after launch, XScale was offered to Marvell, placing an finish to Intel’s ARM journey.

Okay, now let’s speak concerning the telephones that you just had been considering of while you began studying – these Android telephones that had been powered by Intel Atom chips.

Motorola was an early adopter with the likes of the RAZR i in 2012. It ran on an Atom Z2460 with two x86 CPU cores (2GHz, 32-bit) and a PowerVR 544MP2 GPU.


Motorola RAZR i XT890

Motorola RAZR i XT890

This was a reasonably typical setup – Intel CPUs had been designed for bigger gadgets with energetic cooling, so whittling that right down to a smartphone kind issue proved difficult. The corporate may solely match 2 CPU cores, however they had been quick – that they had a number of the finest single-core efficiency you could possibly get again then.

However since there have been solely two of them, multi-core efficiency was under quad-core ARM designs (the primary of which appeared additionally in 2012). Atoms did help Hyperthreading, that’s every CPU may run two {hardware} threads concurrently, but it surely wasn’t pretty much as good as truly having twice as many cores.

Two years later Asus used the identical technology Atom chips within the first ever Zenfones. These had been nonetheless utilizing barely improved the Z2500 sequence of chips from 2013 (nonetheless 32nm, although).


Asus Zenfone 4 (2014)
Asus Zenfone 5 A500CG (2014)
Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG (2014)

Asus Zenfone 4 (2014) • Asus Zenfone 5 A500CG (2014) • Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG (2014)

The following technology, the Atom Z3000 sequence, did go as much as quad-core CPUs, partly because of dropping to a 22nm node. These had been used within the likes of the trendy Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe and the Zenfone Zoom ZX550. As mentioned in a earlier article, the Zoom had a 28-84mm periscope telephoto lens with easy zoom. This know-how was misplaced for a number of years, however it’s making a comeback.


Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
Asus Zenfone Zoom ZX550

Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML • Asus Zenfone Zoom ZX550

Intel chips had been featured in Asus’ remodeling PadFone sequence too – these may slot right into a pill dock to while you needed a bigger display. There was the confusingly named Fonepad 7 too, a pill with cellphone performance (in contrast to the PadFone, this could not flip into something). The Transformer Pad may flip into an Android laptop computer, although.


Asus PadFone mini (Intel)
Asus PadFone mini 4G (Intel)
Asus Fonepad 7 (2014)
Asus Transformer Pad TF103C

Asus PadFone mini (Intel) • PadFone mini 4G (Intel) • Fonepad 7 (2014) • Transformer Pad TF103C

Dell had remodeling tablets as nicely, just like the Venue 10 7000. The thick cylindrical half on one aspect may slot right into a keyboard dock. The smaller Venue 8 7000 was meant for standalone utilization, but it surely additionally had an uncommon design with a large front-facing speaker. These had been attention-grabbing followups to the normal Venue 7 and eight.


Dell Venue 10 7000
Dell Venue 8 7000
Dell Venue 7
Dell Venue 8

Dell Venue 10 7000 • Dell Venue 8 7000 • Dell Venue 7 • Dell Venue 8

In 2015 Acer launched the Predator 8 – as you possibly can inform by its design, this was a gaming pill. It was powered by the Atom x7-Z8700, which featured 4 CPU cores (no Hyperthreading) and an Intel-developed GPU.

Way more informal had been the likes of Lenonvo’s Yoga Pill 2, which was designed for multimedia consumption at dwelling with its built-in kickstand and highly effective audio system.


Acer Predator 8
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 10.1

Acer Predator 8 • Lenovo Yoga Pill 2 10.1

The Nokia N1 from 2014 seems to be fairly common on the floor and it’s, however what made it uncommon is that it was made by Microsoft shortly after it acquired Nokia’s Gadgets & Companies division. It runs Android too, though that could be a bit much less unusual when you think about that Microsoft launched the primary Android-powered Nokia gadgets a number of months earlier (the Nokia X sequence).


Nokia N1

Nokia N1

The mixture of an Intel CPU and Microsoft Home windows is so frequent that it has a nickname, Wintel. So the place are the Intel-powered Home windows tablets? Nicely, Microsoft was making an attempt to interrupt free from its dependency on Intel (and x86 CPUs on the whole) by creating Home windows RT that ran on ARM. This introduced us slates just like the Nokia Lumia 2520.

There have been some Atom-powered Home windows tablets too, since Allview did not fairly purchase into the entire “Home windows on ARM” factor. One was additionally a little bit of a transformer – it ran Home windows 10, which made much more sense than making an attempt to get a laptop computer expertise out of Android 4.4 (we’re taking a look at you, Asus). Allview did make a KitKat pill (the Viva i10G), although fortunately it did not go the transformer route with it.


Allview Wi8G
Allview Wi10N PRO
Allview Viva i10G

Allview Wi8G • Allview Wi10N PRO • Allview Viva i10G

There are numerous extra Atom-powered tablets – from Xiaomi, Samsung, HP, Micromax and others.


Xiaomi Mi Pad 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 P5210
HP Pro Slate 10 EE G1
Micromax Canvas Tab P690

Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 • Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 P5210 • HP Professional Slate 10 EE G1 • Micromax Canvas Tab P690

Here’s a machine we did not count on to select an Intel chip – the Tag Heuer Linked Modular 45. Sure, a smartwatch. An costly one at that, $1,200/€1,100 for the 41mm mannequin at launch. It had a titanium case and a ceramic bezel across the 1.39″ AMOLED show (lined with sapphire glass). And an Intel Atom Z3000 sequence chipset operating Android Put on OS 2.1. Oh, by the way in which, that worth we talked about was simply the start line. Slap sufficient diamonds on this pet and it may simply develop to six digits.


 Tag Heuer Connected Modular 45

Tag Heuer Linked Modular 45

The final machine we wish to point out is that this magnificence – the Nokia 9000 Communicator. It did not use an Intel chip technically, however as a substitute was powered by an AMD-made 486 operating at 33MHz. You possibly can learn extra about this communication powerhouse in a earlier Flashback put up.

Nokia 9000 Communicator
Nokia 9000 Communicator (picture credit score)

As you possibly can inform, issues dried out round 2014/2015. Makes an attempt at mainstream adoption had failed and solely oddball designs had been relegated to utilizing Intel chips. The corporate ultimately stopped making Atom chips for smartphones and tablets and producers had moved on anyway.

Intel nonetheless had its modem division, till promoting it to Apple in 2019. Apple itself dropped into from the Mac computer systems with the introduction of the Apple M chipsets.

Flashback: a look back at Intel-powered smartphones and tablets

Intel is totally out of the cellular sport now, but it surely had larger points to fret about within the latest years (its foundry progress had stalled, giving TSMC the lead). Android nonetheless helps x86, although you’re unlikely to see this in motion. Home windows 11 can run Android apps, even ones meant for ARM gadgets, however that’s enabled by emulation – the Intel Bridge Expertise, which was developed by (you guessed it) Intel.